
It is important to dress well at political events lest one provoke the ire of the Assemblyman. Councilman Steve Levin, center, gets it. — Photo by Aaron Short
With the exception of the unpredictable and lively Attorney General’s race, few statewide offices will have competitive primaries, and many incumbents won’t even appear on the ballot this September.
Still, there are lessons that can be gleaned from events such as the Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council‘s annual senior picnic, featuring seniors, steak, and salsa dancing. On two days, more than four thousand seniors fill 20 chartered buses for the hour-long trip to the Sunken Meadows State Park campgrounds, where they are treated to a steak lunch and a chicken dinner. The camp is divided up so each senior center gets a table or a section of the grounds, and its own grill station.
That is a lot of votes and that’s not lost on the parade of elected officials who come by to greet them while they nosh. This year, there were appearances by Governor Paterson, Mayor Bloomberg, Senator Gillibrand, District Attorney candidate Kathleen Rice, State Senators Martin Dilan and Carl Kruger, Assemblyman David Weprin, Borough President Markowitz, Public Advocate Bill De Blasio, and Councilmembers Steve Levin, Brad Lander, David Greenfield, Mark Weprin, and, of course, Assemblyman Vito Lopez, who also sponsored the picnic.
Let’s take a look at five lessons we’ve learned from this lackluster campaign season:
If you’re campaigning to seniors at a picnic — lose the tie and don’t wear sandals.
Lopez isn’t always the best-dressed person at political events, but he knows what’s appropriate and he isn’t afraid to tell you if you’re wearing something weird. That’s what happened during a press conference on the hill at the grounds, where the assemblyman made fun of De Blasio’s Teva-like shoes and Markowitz’s retiree-themed strappy leather sandals. At least they didn’t wear socks with them. Lander and Kruger wore ties with collared shirts and looked uncomfortable.
As for the winners of the day, Vito wore a nautical-themed striped polo shirt that complemented his complexion, though he looked a bit peakish on Thursday. Mayor Bloomberg wore a bright pink collared shirt and khakis which would not look out of place in Bermuda, and Levin, who clearly needed no coaching whatsoever, matched a sharp black polo with skinny khakis and tortoise-shell Raybans. Well done.
Speaking of Steve Levin, the councilman is going to be here a while.
At the age of 29, Levin is the second youngest sitting councilman, and has three more years in his term. Incumbents rarely lose, and with solid support in Greenpoint and Williamsburg, Levin could easily earn another seven years in office. If New Yorkers vote against a ballot measure limiting the Mayor and members of City Council to two four-year terms, Levin could potentially be in office until 2021, when he will turn 40. A number of non-term-limited state legislature positions could crop open by that point.
Campaign debt can be quickly forgiven.
In her city council campaign last year, Maritza Davila raised over $80,000, received pubic matching funds, and spent nearly all of it in an attempt to topple incumbent Councilwoman Diana Reyna. Though Davila lost, the business of the campaign did not conclude, as the city fined her for $18,000 for not removing campaign posters in a prompt fashion (the state campaign finance board lists Davila’s account as $120,000 in debt, though sources believe this could be a bookkeeping error). It’s not an insignificant amount, but it is surmountable, since the city will likely settle with Davila as it typically does in cases like these and she will only have to pay a much smaller fine.
Petition challenges are about draining opponents’ resources more than anything else.
District leader candidate Esteban Duran has already beaten back two court challenges for his petitions this month, but Lopez and the Kings County Democratic Party could still appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals. With the election a mere three weeks away, this strategy of endless appeals is clearly more about draining Duran’s campaign resources than excising him from the ballot. Duran’s attorney is likely costing him several thousand dollars and preventing him from spending time canvassing in the district. It goes without saying that Lopez and Duran don’t like each other, and haven’t for almost two decades, but the court challenge is less about personal enmity and more about electoral strategy.
Vito Lopez is likely thinking about his mortality more than usual.
On Sunday, the South Brooklyn political community mourned attorney and political insider Bernard Catcher, who died this week after a long bout with cancer.
Three years ago at a Kings County dinner, Lopez called Catcher a “hero” and told him to “keep doing what you’re doing,” and on Sunday, Lopez made stirring remarks to a packed audience at Catcher’s funeral, earning a few laughs.
Catcher, a district leader, was a long-time friend of Lopez’s and both commiserated over battling cancer, which Lopez himself has fought since 1993.
Lopez’s only opponent this fall is Duran, but a spate of Democratic district leader races throughout the county put forward by the New Kings Democrats has gotten his attention.
Lopez, who seems to be brimming with energy, has been known to work long hours — sometimes until 2 or 3 in the morning, and vacations rarely. His work ethic takes its toll on him physically, but Lopez usually bounces back after an election season or bouts of illness with as much pugnacity as ever.
Still, Catcher’s death has to resonate.
There has been almost no talk among the Lopez camp, even privately, about what would happen to the assembly district — or the Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council, which survives on Lopez’s funding and connections — when he eventually steps down from his seat.
Angela Battaglia, Lopez’s girlfriend and RBSCC’s Housing Director, would be a natural choice to succeed him, but she is much better known as a behind-the-scenes negotiator for the nonprofit as opposed to public officials such as Senator Martin Dilan and Councilman Erik Dilan.
Lopez, who seems to relish his role as a campaign strategist much more than an active campaigner, has been spending much of his time this summer at his Wyckoff Avenue clubhouse to ensure that his state committee candidates come out on top.
If they lose to a large number of New Kings-backed candidates, Lopez could have more than his health to worry about.





Whatajoke August 26th, 2010 at 3:02 pm
This is so far outside the realm of appropriate. I can’t believe anyone would agree to pay Mr. Short for this filth. He is obviously an incredibly evil and small person, unfortunately he is given a forum to dish the garbage. The only thing this campaign season has taught me is Aaron Short is in Diana Reyna’s pocket, he is not a journalist, and there is no limit to how low he will go to attempt to discredit Assemblyman Lopez.
Nast August 26th, 2010 at 7:03 pm
One mention of Reyna in the article and Short is an evil guy. Get a grip. Lopez is top dog, so the coverage is appropriate.
Interesting article AS, any more pics?
Katie August 26th, 2010 at 8:29 pm
You have to admit, Short never writes anything critical of Diana Reyna and her clique. Lopez passes one of the most significant pieces of pro-tenant legislation in a generation, and Aaron Short heaps skepticism on the feat (“Verdict Still Out on Loft Law”, etc.).
But what has Reyna done? When are we going to get an article by Aaron Short on the complete waste of time Diana Reyna and Nydia Velasquez are? Aside from bringing a small amount of money to some of the organizations that are loyal to those two (los Sures, St. Nicholas and El Puente), what have either of them done in the combined twenty plus years that they have been in elected office? What piece of significant legislation have either of them fought and been at the forefront of? The simple answer is while each of them puts their name as co-sponsors to scores of legislation, like most useless politicans, neither have ever done anything of substance themselves. Don’t believe me, look it up.
So for those of us that have seen the affordable housing built by Lopez and his tireless fighting, who have seen the families saved from the homeless shelter, have seen the seniors receiving state of the art care at the nursing home, or know kids going to college that might otherwise have ended up on the street if not for ACLA, the double standard is both glaring and obviously the product of simple bias.
Tony August 26th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Katie: go lick Vito’s nuts.
Brandon August 27th, 2010 at 2:24 pm
Why does Lopez put his hame all over the affordable housing he secures, though? Tacky.
Neato August 30th, 2010 at 11:57 pm
I love how Vito can’t get any real journalists to regurgitate his propaganda, so his staffers pathetically try to make his case on blog comments.
It’s no wonder Vito’s sycophants have no love for Aaron Short. Short is an actual investigative journalist — uncovering things like the massive donations Vito took from people connected to the Greenpoint Hospital project, or the fact that he abused his power recently in calling a NYCHA official to testify at a political hearing over an unpaid position — and when they don’t like what Short discovers, they chide him for some imagined allegiance to Reyna and Velazquez instead of changing their behavior.
Andy J. Marte September 1st, 2010 at 5:03 pm
I am sincerely offended by this article. If there is one thing I’ve learned in my short 21 years is that you never plan what’s going to happen after someone’s death. Let people live their lives. The “Vito Lopez is likely thinking about his mortality more than usual” sub-section is truly disturbing and in turns my stomach upside down. Mr. Short cannot even take the death of a person serious enough to write about the life of Mr. Catcher instead of predicting Vito Lopez death.
Mr. Short, I continue to be surprised by your disregard of people. Moreover, I am disgusted by how you yearn for fame by only reporting about Vito Lopez.
Admittedly, I intern for Vito Lopez during the summer while I am away from school at Georgetown University. I, additionally, look upto Mr. Lopez like a father-figure. And quite frankly I am sick and tired of the non-stop biased reporting done Mr. Mr. Short.
Say what you want to say about me, but I am a political junkie–I follow politics country-wide–and I can honestly say with a clear conscience that there is NOT any other politician in the State of New York that does more for struggling families, for students, and for a community than does Vito Lopez.
I understand that the newspaper business is exactly that: a business. Journalists need to make money and need to ensure that people read their papers. Nevertheless, Mr. Short, you are selfishly attacking the wrong person. I am not pretending that Vito Lopez is irreplaceable; however he is doing an amazing job in his position and thus why should we replace someone if they work?
As for the allegations that Short is somehow in Velazquez’ or Reyna’s pocket, it is a valid accusation. I do not allege that Short is being paid off but it is fair to say that Short does report more negatively about Vito Lopez and more positively (or at least more neutral) about Velazquez and Reyna.
As a community activist, I know that people have many things to say about all the elected officials that represent this section of Brooklyn. And so why is it that Short solely focuses on Lopez. According to the American Press Association, “Journalism does not pursue truth in an absolute or philosophical sense, but it must pursue it in a practical sense. This “journalistic truth” is a process that begins with the professional discipline of assembling and verifying facts.” (example: Mayor Bloomberg mentioned DeBlasio and Markowitz’ sandals; but of course, Short had to say it was Lopez in order to comment on Lopez’ style of dress).
According to this definition Mr. Short, you are simply not a true journalist. Some will say that you are a blogger and therefore can interject your opinion. But that further proves the point that you take sides and that side is the side of every other elected official whom you only publish neutral/positive articles about.
I must end by saying that I am embarrassed by the fact that I even read this article. Moreover, I am saddened because BushwickBK.com allows this publication on a website that is suppose to reflect the best of Bushwick.
LUIS A. RAMOS September 5th, 2010 at 1:32 pm
I DON’T KNOW WHO IS WHO EXCEPT THAT I WILL NOT BE VOTING FOR ANYONE WHO IS SUPPORTED BY THE CROOK, VITO LOPEZ, AND I WILL BE VOTING FOR DURAN. SO FAR RBSCC IS PROVEN TO BE FULL OF CROOKS AND WILL COLLAPSE COME NEXT YEAR. MY PRDICTIONS FOR VITO IS HE WILL BE HANDED AN INDICTMENT, RBSCC WILL BE FEDERALLY INVESTIGATED AND POOR MARITZA WILL NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH HER POSTITION. DURAN’S GUYS ARE AT THIS MOMENT GIVING PALM CARDS OUT TO CHURCH VITITORS. AND AS FOR HIS HEALTH, HIS DEMISE WILL BE THE SAVIOR OF THE BUSHWICK COMMUNITY. I CAN TELL THAT SOME READERS HERE HAVE BENEFITED FROM THE LOOT OF VITO LOPEZ, SOME WAY OR ANOTHER. CROONIES IS WHAT THEY SEEM TO BE. SAD…..OH AND I HAVE LIVED IN BUSHWICK FOR THE PAST 45 YEARS….
LUIS A. RAMOS September 5th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
I WILL VOTE AGAINST ALL OF VITO’S State Committee Candidates.