
Lifelong Williamsburg resident and Community Board 1 member Esteban Duran is running for District Leader in the 53rd Assembly District. Unfortunately for him, his opponent is Assemblyman Vito Lopez, who is also the incumbent and does not like to lose. — Photos by Aaron Short
(Updated below)
With the Democratic primary less than a month away, Esteban Duran and Barbara Medina, two District Leader candidates, should be on the street in Bushwick shaking hands and meeting as many constituents as possible in their bid to represent the 53rd Assembly District.
Instead, both are in court this week, staving off a challenge from the Brooklyn’s powerful hulk-like Democratic Party to bounce them from the ballot weeks before the election.
"District Leader" is a sort of nickname for members of a party’s State Committee — as this is North Brooklyn, this means the Democratic Party. DLs get to choose the county party leader, currently State Assemblyman Vito J. Lopez, and weigh in on who gets to run for judgeships. They are chosen every two years, in the Sept. primaries.
Medina and Duran, former staff members of Councilwoman Diana Reyna (Duran also worked for the Department of Education before he was laid off last year), are not strangers to the political scene. They are members of the New Kings Democrats — a three-year old Democratic club, which is challenging Lopez’s supremacy in the Kings County Democratic Party by running a slate of state and county committee candidates throughout the borough.
Both Duran and Medina are long-shot candidates for the state party office. Neither has raised much money and both face incumbents, Lopez and Maritza Davila, with the most extensive mastery of political organizing in the borough.
Actually none of the candidates are raising that much money. Duran and Medina have a few thousand between them, but have not filed expenditure reports with the state yet.
Meanwhile, Lopez’s biggest campaign contributor is… himself. He transferred over $50,000 from his state assembly campaign account to his district leader account, giving him a total of $53,500 to spend.
His female counterpart, Maritza Davila, has raised $2,100 for her campaign, but still owes the city close to $120,000 from her city council campaign last year, so let’s call them even.
Instead of simply brushing off these two first-time political candidates with some direct mail campaigns and phone banking, Lopez is throwing fastballs.
On July 16, the county filed general objections to several candidates’ petitions and followed those up with specific charges against Duran and Medina for permeation of fraud.
Duran and Medina submitted petitions with about 2,000 signatures each, but county attorneys questioned 1,700 signatures for their validity. The Board of Election took a second look and bumped up Duran’s signatures to about 750, well over the 500 required to be on the ballot.
That set up round two of the challenges, which took the candidates to Kings County Supreme Court last week for the tedious questioning of election workers.
In order to prove its case of fraud, Kings County attorney Carl "The Bullet" Landicino has called witnesses who signed Duran and Medina’s petitions and questioned whether signatures match names, whether names match addresses, and in some cases whether individuals signed for others.
"My folks are consistent," said Duran. "They’re trying to allege conspiracy. They’re trying to get it thrown out on the basis of permeation of fraud."
Team Vito rested its case on Tuesday and Team Esteban is presenting Wednesday morning — highlighting the validity of signatures, and the judge should make her ruling on Friday or early next week.
This is not the first time Lopez has put his full weight to bear on such a seemingly small challenge. In 2008, when New Kings was first starting up, he led a similar campaign to toss County Committee members off the ballot.
One must note the presence of a number of Lopez assembly staffers and Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council workers, who are spending their vacations working on the county’s legal challenge for two state committee races. Because there’s no place better for catching some summer rays than civil court.
Update (8/16): On Friday, Judge Carolyn Demarest threw out the plaintiff’s case because of insufficient evidence proving that Duran committed election fraud. In her decision, Demarest went out of her way to show that fraud was not committed and that witnesses against Duran and Medina were not credible. Both will be on the ballot in September, but Lopez may choose to appeal the decision.
Update (8/17): On August 11, Barbara Medina dropped out of the race, voluntarily revoking her ballot, in an announcement made in court. Medina declined to continue her candidacy because of an illness in her family.
(An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Deborah Medina is Barbara Medina’s mother. A Deborah Medina does work at Los Sures and Barbara Medina briefly worked for Councilwoman Diana Reyna last year. We regret the error.)





Katie August 11th, 2010 at 6:42 pm
Kind of funny how little time was spent in this article on the allegation of fraud. It’s actually one of the hardest allegations to prove in court, because you have to prove not merely that someone working for the campaign did wrong, but that this improper action was known about by, and even promoted by the candidate.
If the Judge finds that there was fraud, after hearing from dozens of witnesses, then the issue should be, why were Medina and Duran and their campaign workers committing fraud, right? Why were they committing illegal acts?
It seems to me that Medina and Duran overreached, and probably acted improperly to make sure they submitted as many signatures as possible.
Aaron, how about actually reporting on the substance of the fraud allegations. Is the claim that one person collected an essentially impossible number of signatures, say two thousand? Is it that one person claimed to be in five or six different places on the same day when they collected hundreds of signatures? Is it that some people that signed the petition never saw or spoke to the person who supposedly collected that signature from them? What specifically is beig alleged? Some context regarding these claims would make give your readers more on which to go on.
Dresden August 11th, 2010 at 7:05 pm
Yes we can!!! Unless we’re totally fucking corrupt scumbags!!!
realbushwick August 11th, 2010 at 7:51 pm
I didnt know we could curse here but since we are I’ll say what I’ve always wanted to say Dresden, Aaron, and Jeremy Sapienza you guys are all full of shit and your all fucking corrupt scumbags.
How about that? How about getting a real fucking job and jumping off of Vito Lopez’ nutsack, an elected official who actually works. How about questioning Diana Reyna’s affair with Miguel Martinez (a councilman now in jail) or Nydia’s divorce with her husband. You seem to be interested in people’s personal lives so do yourselves a favor and look into everyone.
If I were Vito Lopez I’d feel so good that you guys are sucking his dick so fucking good.
vertgo August 12th, 2010 at 2:11 am
I was at the New Kings Democrat meeting where they described how to collect signatures. I’ve never heard such a circumspect set of rules, Check Name and address, make sure it’s spelled correctly, don’t allow nicknames like Michael->Mike, get 3-5X as many signatures as necessary because they go through each one and have them thrown out, numbers and dates must always be sequential, etc. It went on for half an hour. These guys were crazy sticklers for the rules. I thought it was ridiculous, but now that I see what happens to them even when they do all that stuff, I’m glad they double-minded their P’s and Q’s.
It really is a great machine Vito has going. All the people collecting signatures for Duran were just volunteers, people who believe in him. Lopez has millions in city money, contracts and promises to families of people, and just crazy amounts of built in power. I don’t think he’s going anywhere unless they can prove his crimes like they proved his predecessor’s. But Lopez I think is a lot slimier and a lot better at hiding his dealings.
And if you ever get a chance, go talk to Esteban. He’s young, earnest and honest. He’s such a decent guy, he might never get a seat in NYC politics.
Nast August 12th, 2010 at 10:38 am
To “realbushwick”
Bad things happen when you stop taking your meds. Watch your back.
Dresden August 12th, 2010 at 10:47 am
Jeez realbushwick – I wasn’t designating anyone specific – they’re ALL scumbags. They are politicians! I have a real job, thanks. And you’ve reminded me why I stay away from this stupid website.
BushwickDill August 12th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
Lopez is a Douche
Harry August 12th, 2010 at 2:30 pm
Vertgo,
What is being alleged here is fraud. It is being alleged that Medina and Duran had people sign their names to petitions swearing that they got or witnessed the signatures when they did not. What is being alleged is that the signatures were fakes, and that Medina and Duran and their campaign staff pushed people to lie. No technicalities are being argued about here, this is all about good old fashioned lying and cheating.
As for who is working on that campaign, the article itself states that Medina’s mother is a long time employee of Los Sures, and you can be sure that Los Sures and St. Nicholas, two not for profits closely aligned with Councilmember Reyna were out in full force for these candidates.
I can’t blame you for thinking this is one sided. Aaron is very biased. Like one of the poster’s commented above, he will never write about her in a negative way, or give the full story of how Duran, a former Reyna staff member himself, has most of her staff working on his campaign now.
Nast August 12th, 2010 at 9:08 pm
“how Duran, a former Reyna staff member himself, has most of her staff working on his campaign now”
Vertigo, that is a complete lie. Get a grip man. By the way, Duran worked for Reyna for like a second, there was a reason for that. Duran is idealistic, but alas not a hard worker and afraid of Lopez.
Dresden August 12th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
It’s all so petty, our local politics. It’s never for the greater good, it seems totally racist, with self-centered narcissists usurping all the power. It’s classic – these people, all of them, are total scumbags out to help their own. What a miserable assembly of humanity!
frankie August 13th, 2010 at 10:43 am
Barbara Medina and Debbie Medina are not related.
realbushwick August 14th, 2010 at 1:28 am
esteban could possibly win a position as dog-catcher if he weren’t such a narcissistic jerk as alluded to by Dresden…
and dresden i’d have to disagree with you again, it seems to me that there are elected officials like Vito Lopez who actually work for the common good. Nevertheless, others selfish acts make him take some unpopular positions and make some seemingly unwise decisions. however, he been the one of the strongest advocates for affordable housing in the State of NY and locally has transformed Bushwick and williamsburg–enough that it now attracts people from around the world
John Dereszewski August 14th, 2010 at 9:46 am
Good article, as always, Aaron. It’s just a pity that the opposing forces see the need to hurl the vilest personal charges against each other. I guess by commet #20, accusations of child molestation will probably raise their ugly head.
Not being interested in such nonsence, I now raise a few points that are actually substantive:
1. The “permeation of fraud” charge is a kind of “Hail Mary Pass” strategy that one makes only after all other alternatives have failed. As noted above, it is a very difficult thing to prove. For this reason, unless the Duran forces did something really stupid – or unless the trial judge is willing to blatently slant his judgment (something that would be vulnerable on appeal) – I think the charge will fail and that there will be a primary election next month.
2. Speaking as one who has no stake in the outcome – although I do not believe a compelling case to oust Vito has been made (I said the same about Reyna last year) – I am especially looking forward to the election, since it will provide a rare opportunity to assess how the 53rd AD has changed over the years and – most importantly – how Vito’s popularity has either waxed or waned. This will, in fact, be the first meaningful election directly involving Vito in well over a decade. One area that particularly perks my interest is the district’s northern frontier – part of “Italian” Williamsburg and Cooper Park housing, where Davilla got creamed last year. Will something similar happen to Vito – or will he be the teflon man.
3. If forced to project the result, I would readily conclude that an easy victory for Vito – a three to one margin does not seem unreasonable – will probably occur. But anything less than a two to one margin will suggest future vulnerability and provide a moral victory to the anti-Vito crowd.
So, I am looking forward to see what unfolds – if, of course, there is something to unfold.
Chris Henderson August 16th, 2010 at 10:57 am
Update: Duran’s on the ballot.
http://tinyurl.com/269byhc
realbushwick August 16th, 2010 at 6:13 pm
FACTS NOT FICTION:
Because, Aaron Short is so up Diana Reyna and Esteban Duran’s behind he once again forgets the most important detail that came up during the court trial. Female District Leader Candidate Barbara Medina dropped out of the race. Medina voluntary dropped out of the race because of concerns with Duran’s candidacy and his petitions.
Nast August 16th, 2010 at 7:41 pm
realbushwick:
Please call 9-1-1, you need a ride to the G building at Kings County.
Medina can do what ever she wants. She is a complete twit. Hey ask her on date, she is nuts too.
Dresden August 16th, 2010 at 7:48 pm
Okay realbushwick, but why’s he act like such a bully? Anyway, I’d like to see someone tell it like it is. I’m sick of being lectured to by the righteous (obama, bush, all of them)… Throw the bums out! America needs a revolution.