
Bushwick resident Fermin Hernandez and his dogs Lucifer (left) and Taco (right) strike a pose on the proposed site for a dog run in the northern portion of Maria Hernandez Park. — Photo by Diego Cupolo
After several years of begging, Bushwick’s dog owners will finally get a dog run of their own after the Parks Department rolled over.
Last month, Parks officials revealed the city will build a dog park Maria Hernandez Park and has begun designing it.
The $425,000 upgrade, which Councilwoman Diana Reyna (D-Bushwick) funded, will cordon off a thin, grassy patch of 7,200 square feet on the northern edge of the park near Irving and Willoughby Avenues. A new entrance gate to the park will be installed at Willoughby Avenue. The entire project is expected to take six to nine months to construct, beginning in the fall, and should be completed by June 2011.
At April’s Community Board Four meeting, several board members questioned the park’s cost, saying the money would be better allocated to other efforts.
|
|||
Though it was not directly answered at the meeting, a parks official said much of the costs of designing a new dog park go towards adding new infrastructure, such as underground plumbing to prevent the area from flooding and new fencing. By comparison, a new, slightly smaller dog park at Sternberg Park in Williamsburg will cost $380,000.
Other community leaders, including Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council‘s Maritza Davila, asked who will oversee the park and how Parks officials would ensure safety for smaller dogs.
"Do people sign an application to be part of the dog park, or can anyone go in there?" Davila said. "We have a number of aggressive animals in the community. I don’t know if I want to take my dog there if the dogs are unlicensed."
Reaction from dog owners to news of the new park has been overwhelmingly positive.
Leah Pryor, 35, of Jefferson Street, drives to the Cooper Park dog run in Williamsburg, and is excited about not having to leave Bushwick. "We love our neighborhood but have always wished it were a bit more dog friendly," she said.
Oscar Vaquero, who also drives to Cooper Park to give his American bulldog some exercise, said he would definitely use the new dog park when it opens.
"That’s good news," Vaquero said, adding that his pet is shy and wouldn’t bother smaller dogs in the park.
A Parks Department spokesperson said the current staff at Maria Hernandez would oversee the dog run just as with other areas of the park, and the run would actually consist of two separate designated areas for both small and larger dogs. But some residents showed concern about aggressive dogs and irresponsible owners.
Greene Avenue resident Denise Ambrusko’s two dogs have been attacked and bitten by other dogs simply walking down the street.
"How are we going to know [irresponsible owners] won’t take these untrained dogs into the run? I won’t bring my dogs there. I simply do not trust many of the dog owners in the area," she said. Ambrusko, 33, said she’d feel more inclined to use the run if it were staffed by bilingual volunteers who could keep order. "Perhaps the answer is to require people to register and carry a card… like at the library," she added. "This way if something does happen an owner can be held accountable."
Art director Michi Turner, 32, lives in the Morgan stop area and has mixed feelings about the run. She finds many dogs in Maria Hernandez Park to be well-mannered, but there are plenty she avoids.
"I also notice that there is a lot more dog shit in Maria Hernandez, as opposed to Cooper or McGolrick Park (in Greenpoint), and that to me is a sign that pet owners aren’t picking up after their pets, being responsible for them," Turner added.
Pryor says the Cooper Park run — Cooper Bark — has developed an organization to govern the use of the facility. "Like other parts of a public park, you can’t ban people or dogs, but that’s where having a core group who know the rules and are comfortable maintaining expectations can come in very handy," Pryor said. It’s her hope that something similar might emerge at Bushwick’s dog run.
"It really does become a self-governing, self-selecting group… It’s not perfect, but it is designed to be a safe place for all dogs and owners," she said.






boyinthebush May 25th, 2010 at 1:44 pm
I too take my dog to the Cooper Park dog run. I’m definitely looking forward to not having to go all the way over there. And, Cooper Bark has a great organization of volunteers that maintain the run and enforce its rules. As far as our new dog run…it’s true that there are many irresponsible dog owners in the neighborhood. That’s also one of my concerns. Making certain everyone understands and abides by the rules is not going to be an easy task. This is all still good news!
Barrett Brown May 25th, 2010 at 3:16 pm
Wow, Maritza Davila sure has some great ideas about how to immediately fuck up the dog park by establishing a layer of unnecessary red tape in order to prevent herself or anyone else from having to go so far as to pick up their little dog and go home if they really consider some other dog to be a threat.
I lived in Austin for seven years none of our public dog parks require the sort of full-time supervision and documentation that Davila is implicitly calling for, as no dog park needs such a thing; a dog owner is perfectly capable of deciding whether or not a given area presents some deadly dog threat to their own pet, and providing close supervision or simply leaving in the rare case that such a threat really exists.
This proposed alternative whereby dogs would have to be registered and someone would have to supervise the dog run for the entirety of its operating hours would of course add quite a bit to the operating costs – which is perhaps what Davila intends, perhaps as a means of providing some plum job to a supporter. What really worries me is that this is not the case and that she honestly believes that this would be a proper use of our money relative to other things upon which it could be spent.
Bob Marino May 25th, 2010 at 5:14 pm
NYCdog is the city’s “United Nations of dog owner groups”- we currently have groups representing more than 50 city dog parks and 30+ off-leash groups.
This dog park will quickly become a postive neighborhood addition. But, it’s important that local dog owners get together now to organize their own group to help oversee the Bushwick dog park and to assist in monitoring construction.
We invite dog owners to contact us. We are made-up entirely of city dog owners and are all volunteers. NYCdog led the successful fight to codify off-leash (see NYCoffleash.com) and today we also help dog park groups. In fact, this fall we will sponsor a dog park summit in conjunction with the Parks Dept.
Respectful, responsible dog ownership is good for all people and all neighborhoods.
In response to Barrett’s well meaning post- the law does not permit fees or registration to use dog parks. However, all dogs must be licensed and vaccinated. The cost to employee a supervisor are prohibitive, but responsible, local dog owners can do the job using peer pressure.
CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN and do get in touch… we can help.
Bob
NYCdog.org
Brandon May 26th, 2010 at 9:38 am
Don’t dogs need to be licensed anyway?
Bob Marino May 26th, 2010 at 9:49 am
Brandon,
Yes, dogs must be licensed in NYC. To do so, they must also be vaccinated.
Unfortunately, most dogs are not licensed. This is partly because the process used to be difficult, but last year the City put the process on line: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/vet/vet-doglicense-form.shtml
Psychologically, we suspect (but do not know) that many dog owners just saw licensing as a tax w/o benefit. However, licensing helps lost dogs be returned to their owners. It also provides a census of dog ownership that is critical when advocating for things such as fenced dog parks.
Personally, if the licensing fee went partly to help the underfunded city animal shelters, that might be more of an incentive for people to license their dogs.
Regardless, it is the law, and NYCdog encourages all dog owners to license their dogs.
Bob
NYCdog.org
NYCoffleash.com
Nast May 26th, 2010 at 2:42 pm
It will be nice to have a place to let my dog safely “air it out”. Thanks everyone.
“Woof”
Monica McLaughlin May 27th, 2010 at 10:21 pm
>>At April’s Community Board Four meeting, several board members questioned the park’s cost, saying the money would be better allocated to other efforts.
These board members are sensible. At a time when state parks are closing and libraries are cutting back hours, this is a true crime. Councilmembers who fork over this kind of money in a time of fiscal crisis are either stupid or corrupt or both.
This dog run costing $425,000 is a scam. We have one in our Upper East Side neighborhood that cost over $1 million dollars. Same thing. There is no infrastructure. The surface will be a crushed stone kitty litter that is never cleaned or changed. It will be a filthy flooded sand pit. Nothing more. Benepe is pushing this sand scam all over the city. It is a shame.
mara May 27th, 2010 at 10:50 pm
This surface does not work. Check out a similar surface at the East 63 St dog run in Manhattan. After only 18 months, the dog run had to be closed twice because the drainage system is not working. It is a money pit. It will require constant readjustments, fixing, and many days where it is just not usable because of excessive dust or flooding conditions.
boyinthebush May 28th, 2010 at 10:11 am
I do agree that $425k is a bit excessive for a dog run. I’m not sure what is the point of the new infrastructure. That area doesn’t flood now–not that I’ve seen. So $425k for a fence and some mulch seems crazy! I’ve been to many dog runs in the city and in Brooklyn. The best ones have mulch. It really is the cleanest alternative. That gravel at the Union Square dog run always smells like pee. I think Cooper Bark is a good model of a successful dog run and it didn’t cost anywhere near $425k.
StopPsuedoScience May 28th, 2010 at 10:15 am
Comments 7 and 8 are from a small handful of dead enders whose jihad against our wonderful dog run at E63rd has failed. These people want their dogs to “play” on hard concrete (as if there isn’t enough concrete in NYC) because they don’t want a few grains of sand in their apartments.
This small cabal of whiners has time and time again harassed local dog run volunteers, parks officials, and time and time again have failed.
There are many other examples around NYC of this successful decomposed granite surface, such as Tompkins Sq, three separate dog runs in Riverside Park, Highbridge; Little Bay Queens.
People vote with their feet. Our dog run recently raised over $8,000 in donations from users and is crowded with happy dogs and owners.
The dead enders have failed, and their whining continues to discredit them.
Charlie May 28th, 2010 at 10:18 am
The surface will be a sandy, dusty, muddy swamp of a pit. I know because the same surface was forced on my community. Go check out the dog run on E. 63rd Street and the esplanade and see for yourself what will happen if the crushed stone surface is installed. Parks will tell you that is “self-draining” it is NOT. It simply is a disaster.
StopPsuedoScience May 28th, 2010 at 11:18 am
Charlie, Monica & Mara = The Concrete Cabal.
Only on the UES could a few yentas cry for a concrete dog run.
Monica McLaughlin May 28th, 2010 at 1:59 pm
StopPseudoScience, you live in Brooklyn and manage Hillside Dog run. The East63rd dog run is not yours and you have never been there. We do not like the dirty surface and you just can’t get over it.
Savage Severe May 29th, 2010 at 9:47 am
A dog park? $425,000 for a dog park?
I don’t have a pet and don’t want one. Why will I need to contribute to a doggie park billed at half a mil?
JCombris May 29th, 2010 at 10:30 am
Yes, Bushwick needs a dog park!
We are probably the last district without one.
Not many people have cars to bring their dogs to the Manhattan parks and taking a large dog on the train is risky (you might be ticketed).
Professional Alternative May 31st, 2010 at 4:25 pm
I don’t play baseball and don’t want to. Why do I need to contribute to several dozens or hundreds around the city which certainly cost many many millions to build and maintain? Because that’s how it works. If you agree with publicly funded parks, you must agree to fund things which you will not use. And if you don’t, well, there are certainly many more expensive features in public parks that are used by a much small slice of the population than dog parks. Criticize them first.
Monica Mclaughlin June 7th, 2010 at 3:46 pm
Dog runs benefit every member of the community — those who own dogs and those who do not. Non dog owners benefit by having a place where dogs go to play (and poop) — gets the dogs (and the poop) off the street.
But $450,000 for a dog run?!!! . . . when a really great state-of-the-art mulch (wood chip) dog run can be built for $30,000?!!! The sand pit style (crushed stone) dog run (like the one that planned) will cost $420,0000 more will alternately flood (and be a mud hole) or be a Texas-style dust bowl. It can even be both at the same time! What it is is a kitty litter box that will never be changed. I know this, because my dogs and I have lived it.
So why would a your council member vote this kind of money in for a dog run while your children suffer from program cuts during the worst financial crisis in recent history? Ask her why. She has a reason, but she most likely is not going to share it.
Brooklyn Dog Lover June 7th, 2010 at 4:46 pm
The poster above attacks the cost but the cost saying $30K would suffice, but what are her qualifications? The article says “a parks official said much of the costs of designing a new dog park go towards adding new infrastructure, such as underground plumbing to prevent the area from flooding and new fencing. By comparison, a new, slightly smaller dog park at Sternberg Park in Williamsburg will cost $380,000.”
So the cost is not just the type of surfacing. Maybe chips would be better; I do not know. But I do know that saying it is $450K vs. $30K without mentioning infrastructire, fencing, water supply, etc. is simply wrong.
In another post, the same person attacks a fellow Bklyn dog owner but admits she (and it seems some others too) are from Manhattan.
Please let us get our own dog park and you worry about yours. Manhattanites get everything. It’s about time we Brooklynites get our share. The same for our dogs.
Monica McLaughlin June 7th, 2010 at 5:38 pm
The sand pit style dog run is a scam invented by politicians to siphon off tax dollars. The Parks Department biggies and those in the city and state in charge of fund allocation find Council Members willing to scam their own communities. Many are not willing. These neighborhoods get great dog runs with ALL the same stuff — running water, benches & fences — there really is not that much to a really great dog run. They also get mulch — wood chips — which are free.
This pit-style run is a dog no matter what borough it is located in. I do live in Manhattan in a wealthy neighborhood — so our sand pit cost us $1.5 million which is 3 times the cost of the Bushwick one. We got nothing extra for 1.5 million dollars. Our run is not 3 times better than yours will be. Our council member was just able to get her hot hands on much more money.
There is NO infrastructure. I repeat, there is NO infrastructure; however Parks will claim the infrastructure is located beneath the ground — where you can’t see it. The area where the Bushwick dog run will be located does not now flood. It WILL flood after they install the sand-pit style run. This is exactly what happened to us.
Please do not become angry with me. Ask lots of detailed questions of your Community Board and City Council Members. Do not believe anything the NYCdog organization says — they work for the Parks Department. We did not know these things. We eagerly waiting the opening of our new dog park and we were blind sided. Don’t let this happen to you.