At the beginning of this election season, something about the 34th council district race had me a bit puzzled. As a person who keeps an ear to the ground in local politics, obviously there was a hot primary contest shaping up between Diana Reyna and Maritza Davila, and all indications were that it would be a close one. Forces in the community were lining up on either side, staff and volunteers being mobilized, funds being raised.
And yet, the cultural community I am most directly connected to, which I often refer to as the "arts-identified community" in lieu of the infinitely more loaded and far less precise "gentrifiers" (gentrification is a complex process, largely not attributable to the individuals at the end of the chain) or "hipsters" (a label of cultural identity which is generally pejorative, suggesting apathy, disengagement, and narcissism), was not even really on the radar for either campaign. There was no real outreach to this community by either candidate. What gives?
On the face of it, I understand why we were not seen as a relevant voting bloc. This community — relative newcomers, significantly younger, significantly whiter, virtually all citizens and English-speakers, less likely to have kids, on average somewhat better off economically than the existing population of the district, and (mostly) either creatives or those in some way connected to or involved with the arts and culture in a less direct way — are not generally seen as engaged in local politics. We are seen as transient, uninformed about local issues, and generally not engaged with or committed to the neighborhood — a hard group to mobilize, and likely to leave as suddenly as we arrived. Moreover, the two candidates in the 34th each have strong organizing bases in the cultural, racial, and ethnic communities and political networks that have dominated neighborhood politics for decades, and which still make up the vast majority of the population of the district. So, why would they even think to pay attention to us?
Simply: because we may have been the deciding factor in this election.
Let’s do a quick back-of-the-envelope for a second. How many voters are we really talking about here? In the absence of any real research on the subject, here’s my stab at some guesstimates, using anecdotal observations and voter registration numbers.
There are about 70,000 registered Democratic voters in the 34th district in 2009, a sharp increase from even two years ago (2007), when there were about 50,000. The increase in total voter registration during this time period was about 30,000, so we’re talking about new people being registered in the district, not party-switchers.
Some significant portion of the 50,000 registered Democrats in 2007 were certainly part of the arts-identified community. Given the huge increase in the arts-identified population of the neighborhood over the past few years, I would argue that, even given the significant increases in voter registration during the Presidential election cycle, that new arts-identified community residents may make up a significant portion of the 20,000 registrant increase (even though, yes, a disproportionate number of these folks may not be registered to vote in the district). Let’s be conservative, and say there are maybe 5,000-10,000 arts-identified community folks who are registered Democrats in the 34th.
There were 9,200 Democratic votes in the 34th district primary this week, a (woefully low) 13.2% turnout rate. Even if we assume that the turnout among the arts-identified community is significantly lower than the average, we’re talking about a significant number of votes. Going with the low-end estimate of 5,000 registrants, if our turnout were 10%, that would be 500 votes. Or, if turnout was an almost impossibly low 5%, that would be 250 votes.
The margin of victory in the 34th, after this weekend’s recount, is Diana Reyna up by 251 votes.
Pretty much everyone in the arts-identified community that I talked to during this election was planning to vote for Diana, apart from a few folks in South Williamsburg who supported also-ran Gerry Esposito. Literally no one I know in this cultural community was planning to vote for Maritza. This result certainly can’t be attributed to a lack of visibility — Maritza posters dominated in East Williamsburg and North Bushwick, where many arts-identified folks are concentrated, and her volunteers were out in force. For purposes of this discussion, it’s not particularly important to get into detail about the reasons Maritza was so unpopular in our community, but I’ll say this for the record: what I’ve heard leads me to believe that this was largely a referendum on the machine politics of Vito Lopez. Yes, Diana was generally seen as the more progressive candidate, but I think that in this case "progressive" generally meant "not the Democratic machine," rather than "in line with many of our values, priorities and interests," especially since there are few if any concrete policies she has advanced that anyone I spoke with could point to.
During the campaign, neither candidate offered much that spoke to our community’s issues. In fact, I think that if elected, either of them might advance agendas which could be detrimental to our direct interests, for example in the case of cracking down on live/work loft conversion, which both candidates to some extent have advocated.
Personally, I know and have worked with both Diana and Maritza, as have a number of other organizers I know in the arts-identified community. Both of them have been seen at neighborhood art events over the past few years, and have expressed support for the idea of working with us toward an integrated community as we plan for the future of the neighborhood — although the details of how this would happen are still quite vague, to say the least.
But in this election, among people I know in the arts-identified community, Diana was seen as more open to working with us on building a shared agenda going forward, more independent, and more accessible and responsive than Maritza — and, more importantly, her Democratic machine backers — would be. And the political leadership of our community, diffuse and relatively new to the area as we may be, were instrumental in spreading this message to those who may have been less informed and engaged about the issues at hand, and the nuances of local politics.
I hope and expect that Diana will take her narrow margin of victory to heart, and recognize the importance of our community as a relevant and growing voting bloc, and a partner — if not an entirely equal one yet, at least in terms of numbers — alongside other cultural communities in the district. If Diana commits to building a true working relationship with us, and working with us to develop a policy agenda which will benefit both our cultural community and all of the other interests in the district, it will go a long way in advancing in our shared efforts toward making our neighborhood a place where we all can live, work, and participate in civic life for a long time to come. And, it may win Diana and her allies more elections.





tommygunz September 21st, 2009 at 12:50 pm
Spit it out and list it out. What does the so called “arts-identified community” want? From what I can tell any person elected to the 34 district just ends up being a firefighter. Essentially, trying to fix everybody’s damn problem while you freaking hipsters do what?
Joseph September 21st, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Thanks for a great analysis of the recent election. I voted and I was really disappointed at how few of my neighbors of all backrounds bothered to go to the polls. I too voted against the RBSCC machine but I hope our council member was aware that this is a diverse district and ultimately she will need to address issues that impact folks beyond her traditional constituency.
Professional Alternative September 21st, 2009 at 1:31 pm
Tommygunz/Nast, I know you’re on Diana’s payroll, but do you have to make it SO obvious? I mean, you spend all your time posting all over the internet in defense of her.
Anyway, what do we “hipsters” do? Pay for it all. We don’t need housing projects, “affordable” housing, Section 8 vouchers, work programs, subsidies for our businesses or workplaces, or anything that the local pols here spend virtually all their time pursuing. That is why they do NOT work for us. What I’d like is cleaner streets, more attention paid to excessive noise violations, and as noted in this article, less persecution of loft dwellers and their landlords, among other things.
We voted for Diana because Maritza is far worse. But do not get it twisted — Diana SUCKS.
reyna will f*ck everyone over September 21st, 2009 at 1:39 pm
diana reyna hasn’t done anything in the past 8 years, what makes you think she is going to do anything for anyone. Unless of course she and Mayor Bloomcorruptberg are planning to extend term limits again… which i wouldnt doubt…
and wtf is wrong with organizations like RBSCC, and St. Nicks, and Los Sures, organizations that do good for the 34th Council. I guess the hipsters want groups like Mak the Road, a bunch of ivy league graduates who intellectualiz everything, and think they know whats best for everyone else.. give me a freaking break…
tommygunz September 21st, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Your mother sucks. If you don’t like it the was it is, MOVE!
Jon Geeting September 21st, 2009 at 1:41 pm
I think one of the main issues is just accountability – an end to machine politics and cronyism, politicians who have ties to the neighborhood and are willing to stand up for the community against overreaching developers, shitty landlords, etc. In a functional one-party system like NYC, where everyone is basically liberal and also dissatisfied with the actual Democratic leadership, the only way to enforce accountability and prevent corruption is through constant primaries of machine candidates – or in this case, defending an incumbent against the machine. The want list for the “arts-identified community” is probably pretty short, and I’m not even really sure I can say what they are. But on top of my list is better governance, and an end to quid pro quo political favors. Our reps aren’t even going to begin to listen to any of us until we start beating a few of them in elections.
tommygunz September 21st, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Your mother sucks. If you don’t like it the way it is, MOVE!
Professional Alternative September 21st, 2009 at 1:56 pm
That’s not how it works. If it were, why have elections? I mean really, why is Reyna better than Davila, aside from the machine bit? They both have identical policies — they just exercise them for the benefit of different groups. If you get paid by Diana, you pull for her. If you get paid by RBSCC/Vito, you pull for whomever they tell you to. Simple. This was no noble fight against tyranny. This was a bitch-slap match between two bloated graft machines, one a bit bigger than the other.
Dresden September 21st, 2009 at 2:09 pm
The “arts-identified community”? “Both…have expressed support for the idea of working with us toward an integrated community although the details of how this would happen are still quite vague”????
Are you weetawdit? It seems to me your building walls I don’t exactly recognize as EXISTING! I’m a white straight guy who likes art, also enjoys tacos, doe-eyed children playing in fire hydrant water, and practicing my Spanish…
Perhaps THAT’S how this IS HAPPENING. Holy fucking shit I think Laura Braslow lives in alternative universe where it’s us and them – and I’m one of hers!!!! Jumping fuck Jesus on a pogo stick!
LauraB September 21st, 2009 at 4:03 pm
Dresden – I can’t tell if you’re being serious or not, but assuming that you are… I actually completely agree with you. I wish that the differences among cultural communities I’m talking about were only part of an “alternate universe,” and we were all holding hands and signing kumbayah in Maria Hernandez park.
Unfortunately, on the ground, in terms of how people of all subcultural communities in the neighborhood talk to and about each other, these perceived cultural differences do exist, and have real impacts in terms of organizing, political and economic issues on the ground. We need to address them if we are going to make any progress on breaking down these lines. This is the goal of community organizing and bridge-building, and is a lot of the work that I and others in the “arts-identified” cultural community are involved with, in concert with leaders of other cultural groups in the neighborhood, who also recognize this issue.
Bay Ridge Billy September 21st, 2009 at 7:12 pm
RE:
“..the cultural community I am most directly connected to, which I often refer to as the “arts-identified community” in lieu of the infinitely more loaded and far less precise “gentrifiers” (gentrification is a complex process, largely not attributable to the individuals at the end of the chain) or “hipsters” (a label of cultural identity which is generally pejorative, suggesting apathy, disengagement, and narcissism…”
Are you fucking kidding me.
That quote is just a long way of saying you are a fucking hipster. My black, arab and latin friends call me white boy.
Let me translate that for you:
“white boy” (a label of cultural identity which is generally pejorative, suggesting a serious lack of style, pigment, and hardship)”
That’s me except for the hardship but wtf, I actually get a kick out of people referring to me that way.
Johnny September 21st, 2009 at 7:24 pm
“Arts-identified community” is perhaps one of the worst phrases ever invented.
John Dereszewski September 21st, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Terrific job Laura. By combining the quantitative with the anecdotal, you made a pretty strong case that the hipster/artist community was one of the factors that converted what could have been a deadheat or even a narrow defeat into a modest victory for Reyna. Given the fact that it is very difficult to geographically pinpoint the impact of this group in the election, this was a very fine accomplishment.
Speaking of “Vito and the hipsters” – not one of the new fall shows! – it is ironic that when the first artists entered the East Williamsburg scene in the mid to late 1980′s, Vito was one of their strongest supporters. During that time, I chaired CB 1′s Land Use Committee and worked very closely with Vito in successfully opposing the forced eviction of artists from the lofts situated at – I think – 274-300 Morgan Ave. – between Metro and Grand. He even got the legislature to pass a law on their behalf. These actions forged a strong bond between Vito and these artists – they even hosted several really terrific fundraisers on his behalf at their loft.
While I am not sure what has ensued during the intervening years,it is interesting to remember how things stood between Vito and East Williamsburg’s new artists just twenty years ago.
LauraB September 21st, 2009 at 10:46 pm
John -
Thanks! That means a lot coming from you. Also, I very much appreciate the history regarding Vito and the arts community, it’s so helpful to have someone who has been around for decades to put all of this in context. I knew that Vito had a very different relationship to a lot of folks in the area when he started out, but did not know about connections with the arts community specifically. Would be really interesting to ask him about it sometime, while wearing adequate protective gear of course. ;)
Laura
LauraB September 21st, 2009 at 10:51 pm
Johnny – I agree, it’s not the most elegant phrase ever invented, but after a few years of playing with it I don’t have a better option. Any ideas (other than “fucking hipsters,” which I hope all but Billy can agree is pretty useless and counterproductive) would be much appreciated.
LauraB September 21st, 2009 at 11:04 pm
Oh, and to the poster above – there are MAJOR differences between Los Sures, St. Nicks and RBSCC, both in terms of how they work and who they work with/for. The question is, what are they actually doing on the ground, and how do they operate? How accountable are they, and to whom? There’s a place for groups focused on advocacy/organizing like Make the Road, and place for groups focused on service provision (that also do some advocacy, for sure) like those you listed.
I think that we’re lucky to have so many great CBOs serving our community, in so many different ways. It’s actually quite a unique situation, and presents unique problems with competition, factionalism, etc, as well as unique opportunities.
ricmac01 September 21st, 2009 at 11:10 pm
Twice in the past ten years New York voters voted in favor of term limits. Diana Reyna, in the final year of her term, voted to ignore this mandate, allowing her to run yet again for this office. By this vote, I believe she pretty much told us that she will pick and choose which of our needs she will address, depending on how it may (or may not) benefit HER.
By this action I believe she already told us that our vote doesn’t count, so why would anybody continue to vote for her? This is what has me puzzled. (for the record, I voted – for Maritza Davila)
Jeremy Sapienza September 22nd, 2009 at 7:41 am
I agree Reyna’s term limits vote was egregious. But given the choice in this race — Esposito seeming the best candidate overall, but not having a real chance to win — Maritza was worse, and certainly Vito Lopez has no problem with gutting term limits.
Dresden September 22nd, 2009 at 11:52 am
Laura, I disagree with you. Even when I’m in a suit and a tie, I cut through the shit and force real human interactions based on mutual respect and mutual interest. Most people, I believe, want the same things I do – peace, cleanliness, quiet, stability, etc.
Issues of race and cultural differences are only transcended on the same level you seem to cite as being their most evident – on the street. And I don’t see them on the street. You do. I see them among you intellectual types and psuedo, dinner table politicians. HERE IN THE TRENCHES, WE’RE ALL THE SAME.
Let me tell you, your article doesn’t include me, and probably doesn’t include most of the people I interact with in our neighborhood. You are exactly NOT on the street – you’re in some cafe pretending you know what you’re talking about.
Bay Ridge Billy September 22nd, 2009 at 2:09 pm
word up dresden
LauraB September 22nd, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Dresden – like I said, I agree with you, and I share your vision. I’ve been in the trenches in Bushwick for five years, which isn’t that long but is longer than some, and have worked with individuals and organizations from all walks of life in the neighborhood. Personally, I approach life here the same way you describe, and that’s why I love and am committed to this neighborhood and its future.
I wish more than anything that all of the folks I was talking about in my article felt the way you do, cut through the issues and forged the human interactions you describe. But that’s just not true, yet. When I talk to people in the community I was describing, many see themselves as separate from and unconcerned about the neighborhood as a whole, some want to build relationships but feel stymied by tensions they don’t know how to address, and some have done the work that you describe to forge connections.
It’s great to hear that you and the people you interact with fall into the later category, that’s the goal I (and other folks I work with individually and through a variety of organizations) are working toward fostering broadly, throughout the neighborhood. This is fundamental to developing responses to real problems – like housing affordability and displacement, quality of life issues, etc – and requires a recognition of the real issues, both cultural and economic, that exist for all of us in somewhat different ways.
The only reason I’m invested in describing these issues is to bring to light the existing tensions and divisions that I hit up against all the time, so that we can address them openly and move through them toward a real working relationship among a greater share and mix of neighborhood residents. Unless we recognize the fact that there is work to be done, we’ll be doomed to repeat the history of other neighborhoods (Chelsea, Soho, East Village, Northside Williamsburg) where diverse communities with diverse interests were not able to come together around a shared agenda until it was too late – if at all – and most of us will be looking for a new neighborhood in the foreseeable future.
Of course, if you’re not concerned about that, then I guess you’re right that all of this is largely academic. Or, maybe you have some concrete ideas about how to achieve some degree of improved stability and sustainability in the face of the rapid development coming down the pike that you’d like to share? We’re going to be doing some work on this on the Community Board this year if you’re interested in getting involved.
Dresden September 23rd, 2009 at 9:11 am
Laura – blow your arts-inspired community out your ass. Thanks.
Jeremy Sapienza September 23rd, 2009 at 10:03 am
While “arts-identified community” is a flawed term — I think Laura admits as much, and that it’s for lack of a better term — it’s a better way to describe those of us who are new and who aren’t, say, Mexican day laborers. Because “white” doesn’t do it, and “hipster” is meaningless. Maybe, as Dresden hard-ass-kumbaya describes, we don’t need such a label, but it’s clear from the contortions used to describe us on this site over the last few years, it may be necessary.
That said, I fall somewhere in between Dresden and Laura — it’s clear that “we” are NOT members of the many communities that call Bushwick home. Clear, undeniable, no matter how many bodega men you chat up and children you smile at. However, I also don’t think we need intentional organizing to close this gap — we may very well just slowly melt our way in, the way the Dominicans did into the Puerto Rican milieu (even if it’s often as the latter’s landlords and bosses), the way the Puerto Ricans did into New York’s black and Italian cultures, in a way.
Of course, the world is changing, it’s increasingly rare (despite the current recession) to be poor, so that is not what will bind us. It will probably just be a long-term shared experience in this place that we all use.
Bushwick is huge and dense and I don’t see it being washed over by a wave of East Villageness any time soon. Or I could be wrong; my block is twice as “arts-identified” in the last few months (of course the people in the hood who I know own their places are still around, as are their families and tenants).
What I do know is that all these orgs Bushwick is “lucky” to have cannot repeal the laws of economics, and just like in every other neighborhood, if they keep their constituents from becoming responsible self-reliant people, they will all be moving out in a few years, no matter how many landlord harassment laws they get passed or lead paint protests they provoke. That’s the real organizational conundrum: how to undo the culture of dependency that has ruled — and ruined — every city since LBJ.
Dresden September 23rd, 2009 at 11:27 am
Jeremy – I am a member of humanity. That’s the point. In a world where uber-liberals swing around on the pendulum to become fascists, the difference between a gated community and a homosexual support group becomes relatively the same thing to me. Not taking part in many of the “communities” doesn’t draw substantial enough boundaries between us and them for me to find them at all relevant. Good luck bringing us together – I personall don’t think all this discussion does that.
Jeremy Sapienza September 23rd, 2009 at 11:41 am
I suppose I agree. I “suppose,” because the boundaries are certainly there, I just don’t care. People can associate or not associate with whomever they want. I was just saying that these boundaries disappear with interaction over time. I’m not assigning a value to that.